My 4xgreat grandfather William Moorhouse Stoney had a long and varied life, and several brushes with the law – including time on a prison Hulk. Most of this was before his second marriage and the births of his children, including my 3xgreat grandmother Catherine Alice Stoney.
The Hulk Registers of 1819-1823 confirm his place of birth
as Kettlewell, Yorkshire, his birth year as around 1778. Kettlewell
is in the West Riding of Yorkshire, in Wharfdale, postal town Skipton (which William
Moorhouse Stoney gives as his birthplace in the 1851 census). His
birth year in the censuses ranges from 1765 (probably rounded down)-1771. I
have not found a baptism for any William Moorhouse Stoney in online
records between 1765-1778. I did find a baptism at Kettlewell in 1776:
The entry from FindMyPast reads (2nd line in image above): William, natural son of Mary Stoney, Bapt. Dec 31st . There are many other Stoney baptisms in West Yorkshire, particularly Pateley Bridge, Leeds and Huddersfield within a similar period. However, the above baptism seems the most likely in terms of date and place. FindMyPast also has records of Stoneys living at Kettlewell from the 1600s, although the surname is widespread across Yorkshire.
So what more – if anything – can be found to prove or
disprove that William Moorhouse Stoney was the son of the unmarried Mary
Stoney of Kettlewell?
If Mary Stoney remained unmarried, then she may be
the woman of that name, aged 42, who was buried in Kettlewell on 10 April 1799.
The burial
record (Bishop’s Transcript) at FindMyPast gives her occupation:
Mantua Maker (see second line below):
mantua | Fashion History
Timeline (fitnyc.edu) quotes Elizabeth Lewandowski in The Complete Costume
Dictionary (2011), who defines a mantua as:
“Early Georgian (1700-1750). Formal gown with formerly drapery
in the back. Worn over boned bodice and with elaborate skirt. Popular in the
United Kingdom longer than elsewhere.” (186)
The Kettlewell incumbent
may not have known the precise fashion difference between a Mantua or the
styles that came later, or rural Yorkshire ladies may have continued, as the
quote above suggests, to wear them long after they fell out of fashion
elsewhere, and require their local mantua maker to sew them for them.
However, the same site
also notes: “In addition the Encyclopedia
of Clothing and Fashion explains the enduring legacy of the
mantua on later fashion:
“The pulled-back overskirts of late-seventeenth and early-eighteenth-century mantuas (loose-fitting
gowns) emphasized this area [the rear of the dress], and pads or “cork rumps”
sometimes supported the swagged-up styles of the late 1770s and 1780s.” (204)
It is likely that Mary
Stoney constructed mantuas for her Yorkshire customers well into her 30s,
in the late 1790s, perhaps adjusting styles to reflect more modern tastes.
If aged 42 in 1799, it is likely that she was born around
1757. A search for her baptism at Kettlewell around that time finds a very
untidy parish register for 1756 at FindMyPast.
Just legible in the sloping entry
is March 27 Bap: Mary ye Daughter of John Stoney of Kettlewell Yeoman.
The only other likely records we might find for Mary
Stoney beyond her baptism and burial, could be if there was an examination
by the poor law guardians to find the name of the father of her illegitimate
child. But if she wasn’t a pauper or the child was unlikely to be a burden on
the parish, this may not have happened. Was she supported by her family? Who
was her father, John Stoney, Yeoman of Kettlewell?
For the sources mentioned in bold, see blogpost: MyRoots: Lesly's family history: Sources and resources: A quick view
No comments:
Post a Comment